19 小時前
$SOL | Solana is Resilient and Decentralized.
Here is why that matters as an investor:
🔸Risk mitigation -> Lowers volatility from outages/attacks
🔸Security -> Protects against centralization threats
🔸Growth potential -> Attracts capital and users
In essence, as an investor, choosing decentralized and resilient networks like Solana means aligning with assets that are built to endure market cycles, attract adoption, and deliver returns on investment.
If decentralization is weak, your investment could face existential risks.
Still not convinced Solana is decentralized after quoted thread?
Here are some additional metrics:
🔸1,295 Total Active Nodes (aggregated based on other sources: 1,982)
🔸Validators are spread across 78 countries (clusters in US, Europe and Asia)
🔸68% of validators run on diverse cloud providers, 25% on on-premises hardware, and 7% on AWS
🔸Nakamoto Coefficient of 23 (based on the top 23 validators controlling 33% of stake)
Solana exemplifies effective decentralization by maintaining a low AWS dependency, achieving zero throughput impact during outages, and sustaining 100% uptime.
Therefore $SOL is and remains my number 1 altcoin investment.
21 小時前
$SOL | Solana's Resilience During AWS Outages
Have you ever wondered why some blockchains stop working during cloud problems?
It's not just bad luck: it's centralization.
Diving into fresh data from AWS Blockchain Tracker on blockchain reliance on @awscloud.
Spoiler: It's worse than you think.
EVERY network with >40% AWS dependency saw significant performance degradation during outages. There is a strong correlation between centralizing infrastructure (hello, AWS) and vulnerability.
Decentralization isn't optional; it's survival.
Solana leads with a Resilience Index of 97.6. Solana 's low dependency (<20% per report metrics) meant zero major disruptions during the last three AWS events. TX throughput? Held steady at 2k+ TPS. This isn't luck; it's smart infra: Multi-cloud + on-chain optimizations.
If you're building or investing, study @solana's Multi-Cloud strategy.
Layer 2s average 46.7% (!) AWS dependency. 2.2x higher than L1's 21.0%. @base has been flagged as a prime risk case, with a Centralization Risk of 16.3. 65%+ AWS exposure led to 40%+ downtime spikes.
Heavy AWS lean-in means one outage = chain-wide chaos.
Lesson for L2s: Diversify your infra or pay the price.
True decentralization starts with infra. Ditch the cloud monopolies where you can and explore multi-cloud, on-prem, or edge solutions.
Let's build tougher networks.
4,263
14
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明，OKX 不是所引用文章的作者，也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考，並不代表 OKX 觀點，不作為任何形式的認可，也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下，此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章，瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險，其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況，仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。